Sunday, November 27, 2011
Girls in a Tech World
Guess What... I'm BLOGGGING!!!!!!!!!!
I've talked with friends before about starting a blog, there are so many things worth talking about publicly, however my insecurities around computer 'stuff' has always prevented me from doing anything besides think / talk about it. But now, here I am, blogging!! Our learning session with Erin was so wonderful, so easy, so much fun!! It's amazing how easy technology can be when its explained in comfortable environment. We learned all the basics, and then got into the 'gadgets' which add some jazz to the plain page. I went home after our session and played around, pushed buttons, screwed up, fixed my mistakes, and within hours I knew what I was doing. So now, just like that I have the skills and abilities to share my voice on the world wide interweb! It's pretty cool, and way more empowering than I thought it would be.
Only a couple weeks ago I was looking at a friend's blog and wishing that I was able to do something like that, but then telling myself it would take too long, be too expensive to learn, be too complicated, but really, it's so easy.
So thanks Erin for pushing me into the realm of cyberspace... I feel strangely at home here, sending my thoughts into the ether... I might just get used to this ;)
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Journal #4: After learning how to blog….
I am so grateful to Erin for this new skill! It’s amazing, being able to explore my thoughts and express myself and post it online for everyone to see. Someone from Germany and Japan looked at our blog! So cool. And anyone can do it, you can learn how to blog in minutes and make your voice heard. I love this, and I think everyone who wants to learn should be allowed the space, especially girls.
Member Meeting
![]() |
| Nathalie learning how to start a blog, and mastering it in minutes! |
Words of Wisdom from Li'l AzĂșcar, 13
Research Study on Girls and Technology
Kekelis et al. conducted a research study to engage a group of 126 girls aged 11 to 19 from a range of ethnicities and socioeconomic backgrounds to investigate why girls interested in technology do not choose to go on in a career in advanced technology. They designed an after-school program, called “Techbridge”, which taught and engaged girls in software engineering, robot making and other avenues of technology, and they formed focus groups to give the girls a space to discuss their relationships with technology. The researchers found three main hurdles girls face when considered pursuing a career in technology:

1) Negative Stereotypes about Computing Jobs
2) A Disconnect between Dreams and Plans
3) Lack of Career Guidance and Support from Family
Application to Girl Power:
Many girls are told by their parents and schools to graduate, go to college or university and to keep their options open and try many things in post-secondary education. Girls are told they can be anything, do anything, and as a result change the world, hence giving them a false sense of power. However, this open-minded guidance has made it hard for girls to focus in on a career, especially technology careers, and it leaves them unaware of the future challenges, barriers, and work required by the careers. Many girls set their minds on a dream career, singing, acting, web designer, or world class D.J., but have no idea of the high school courses, resources and skills needed to get into these vocations. How then, do we get girls to harness the true power of engaging technology and participate in positive prosumption?
Kekelis, L.S., Ancheta, R.W.. & Heber, E. (2005). Hurdles in the pipeline:
Friday, November 25, 2011
Journal #3: Pa Pa Pa Power!
I think the girl who knows technology has access to the greatest girl power of all, the power not only to consume and deconstruct media, but to combat popular media with new, alternative media! It’s a marriage of consumption and production! Also known as PROSUMPTION! Proactive, positive ways of consuming to produce, and producing for others to consume positive messages. You go girls, GIRL POWER REDEEMED!!
The Gendered Dialectic of Technology
I am beginning to realize that this lack of technological skills and abilities in girls and women is part of what Luce Irigaray calls a phallogocentric economy, an economy of castration, an economy of lack. By this she means that women are signified, defined, by what they lack in relation to men. It is women's lack of a penis, lack of "rational thinking", lack of "production skills", lack of "power" that defines her. Men's power and higher social status is dependent, is contingent on what women lack. So to bring it all back together, the master narrative that girls and technology don't mix is a cultural story that keeps girls and women locked into a position of inferiority, of naturalized lack.
But, just like Hegel's master / slave relationship, men's supposed natural technological abilities are in a dialectical relationship with women's supposed natural inabilities. What happens if girls and women start touching the buttons, crossing the wires... ?? That's what we want to do here... we want to empower each other to master the skills many of us have long believed and accepted as purely boys and men's domain.
Why are there no female DJs on DJ Mag's top 100 list?
For the last 10 years, my main source of income has been from DJing. It's taken me around the world, from dive bars in Krakow where the kids went wild when I played Nirvana to glitzy fashion parties in New York where Grace Jones serenaded me with Pull Up to the Bumper wearing only a headdress as I stood in the DJ booth (which was, incidentally, disguised as a tiki hut). I thought, based on my experiences so far, that it could be an exciting career. I've DJ'd in the coolest clubs and the shittest pubs, I've played at a record-breaking 13 parties during a four-day period one London fashion week and I've been flown across the world to play 10 songs at a party. I lost count of the number of mornings I've spent trying to get tequila off my CDs. But just at the point where my parents finally began to understand exactly what it was I did for a living, it became harder to break through into top-billing territory. I hit the glass ceiling. I always thought that term applied to women in skirt suits in big, windowed office blocks – not those whose working day starts at 11pm and involves sticky floors and a disco ball.
I realised that it didn't matter how many times a week I DJ'd or how much I charged or how much people loved what I played, I was losing the impetus to fight my way through the boys' club and try and make it to the top. And if I got there, would the fight to stay there be worth it? Annie Mac, who is one of the handful of really successful female DJs, admits that she might not have made it without her radio show. "I had a profile through that and got gigs through that," she said in a recent interview.
Boys aren't better at DJing than girls. We don't DJ with our vaginas. But the fact is, in my experience, they clearly think they are and do make it more difficult for us. I've had male DJs reach over as I mixed two tracks and start twiddling with the knobs. Or come and stand behind me and instruct me on what to do. My personal favourite was when, at a regular Sunday nightclub, the male DJ who played after me reached over the sound desk and start to change the speed of a track for me. Did he think I had sped the track up slightly on accident? Another brilliantly sexist moment was when a DJ span round and said to me bluntly, "Well, boys just know more about music, don't they." And it's not just the other DJs – there are the soundmen too, who persistently ask me if I know what I'm doing. You know, after 10 years, I'm still not sure.
I guess maybe the whole unbalance is something to do with the fact that it's only in the past 5 years that most venues have acquired CD decks, so you no longer have to play from vinyl, which is heavy to carry. Maybe that's why there are so many more men at the top. They're better at carrying heavy things.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/musicblog/2011/oct/28/female-dj-mag-top-100
Has technology become the new "Boys' Club" ?
The American Association of American Women's (AAUW) study, Gender Gaps: Where Schools Still Fail Our Children documents a diminishing gender gap in achievement in mathematics and science, with one exception -- technology. The study concludes, "While girls have narrowed the gender gaps in math and science, technology has become the new 'boys' club.'"
Only 17% of the high school students who took the Advanced Placement Computer Science test in 1997 were females - the lowest percentage of all tests given. AB Calculus is up to 47%, Chemistry is 42%, Biology is 56%, and Physics, although still dismal, is over 20%. Complete data was published by the College Board.
The AAUW study also concludes
- Girls are significantly more likely than boys to enroll in clerical and data-entry classes, the 1990s version of typing. Boys are more likely to enroll in advanced computer science and graphics courses.
- School software programs often reinforce gender bias and stereotypical gender roles.
- Girls consistently rate themselves significantly lower than boys on computer ability, and boys exhibit higher self-confidence and a more positive attitude about computers than do girls.
- Girls use computers less often outside of school. Boys enter the classroom with more prior experience with computers and other technology than girls.
Thursday, November 24, 2011
Journal #2: My middle name: Technical Difficulty
Why has “technological difficulty” become a key word in my vocabulary? Erin sent me a link to a practice blog she created to get us started and I couldn’t open it. I eventually figured it out, but after much frustration. This is going to be a long road. My laptop, his name is Archibald, has been blue-screening and doing funky things on me lately so this should be fun.
A foot in the door, camera in hand...
I was in amazed to learn in our Girlhoods Studies class that my experience was not uncommon, that it is a documented phenomenon experienced by many young women. Andrea Richards, author of Girl Director, comments: "I think it honestly doesn't occur to girls that they can be a film director -- the possibility has never been planted in their heads because it's so off limits through cultural and gender stereotypes" (quoted in Lipkin, 2009, p. 148). My own experience confirms Richards assessment of the situation. I had never even considered fillmmaking until being introduced to it as a method of present research in a femininst participatory action research class, the thought had never occured to me that I might have ideas worth sharing through film. Still, even after working on three films, I doubt my abilities. I still have this feeling that for some reason I'm incapable, like it was a fluke that I managed to do it all, that I couldn't do it again. I'm intimidated to be in the public eye, I feel like I don't have anything to share that others would find interesting... but I know I do.... it's weird. Elline Lipkin (2009)writes how "girls have to overcome the perception that this [filmmaking] is a sphere in which they don't belong -- no small hurdle to jump" (p. 148). Learning about this stuff in girlhoods is really helping me understand that it's not just me and my own deficiencies that keeps me from jumping in, its the culture I've been raised in.
Looking back on the blog I wrote for the NFB website (see below) following the workshop, I'm surprised to see how I started to realize there were systemic and cultural forces working against me before even reading the theories in Girlhoods Studies that affirmed my own experiences. But still, even knowing this, it doesn't change the reality, the fear, the insecurities... but it does help.
DOXA Connexions: Barriers
This post was written by one of the young women participating in the 2011 Kris Anderson DOXA Youth Connexions Forum, as part of the DOXA Documentary Film Festival. “Connexions” is an immersive 2-week program where 6 selected emerging female filmmakers create 6 short films in 6 days, while also connecting with industry professionals & checking out all the doc films & panels.
The big moment had finally arrived. I stood on stage beside 5 brilliant aspiring filmmakers. We waited prettily in our party dresses and high heels to introduce our films to a sold-out house at the Rio Theatre. My friends and family filled the entire front row. Despite being blinded by the spotlight, I grinned at them proudly. My years of hard work had gotten me here. I could get used to this. The announcer began thanking sponsors and volunteers. I kept smiling.
Then the announcer turned his attention to us, the participants of the 6th annual Kris Anderson Connexions Youth Forum. But what he said made my stomach crunch and my feelings of excitement and anticipation curdle into confusion and smallness. “The Connexions Youth Forum is designed to help youth who face barriers in attaining their goals as documentary filmmakers…”
What!?! Barriers?? Really? And all this time I thought it was a program for talented young women. But I haven’t faced any barriers, I thought to myself. Actually quite the opposite. Through my privilege as a Canadian university student, making films found me, picked me up, and coddled me. I was troubled by this and continued thinking about it over the next few days.
Am I just a girl being given a chance to break through barriers? Or do I actually have talent as a filmmaker? This is a question that taunts many female artists. We are given special recognition for our womanhood, rather than for our art. The same goes for many artists of “marginalized” identities. We remain in special categories, we have our special shows, and are celebrated for our ‘different’ (non white male) identities.
I now realize the barriers I face are not obvious at the surface level. Women filmmakers are dealing with internalized barriers. Barriers arising out of the collective psyche that tell us women and technology don’t mix. Don’t touch those buttons, mind the wires, nevermind the lingo, you wouldn’t understand. It is the reason that in my youth I was an aspiring actress, not a filmmaker; a model, not photographer; a dancer, not a music producer. As a woman I am conditioned to see myself as an object of the public gaze, not as a cultural creator.
It is only in recent years, in the safety of academia (where I have always excelled), that I began touching the buttons, using technology as a medium to enhance research. But it was not until the incredible support I received in Connexions Youth Forum that I am now hoping to pursue documentary filmmaking as a career.
Throughout the Connexions program I felt empowered, excited, motivated and capable. Surrounded by incredible female mentors and peers, and equipped with a PD 150, a tripod, and a shotgun I broke through barriers that I had never even considered challenging.
So next year, if they decide to introduce the Connexions participants as ‘aspiring female filmmakers’ rather than ‘youth facing barriers’ (which skirts around entrenched sexism anyways…), this conversation about ‘barriers’ remains a necessary one. To address a problem such as sexism within the film industry we must recognize and name it. And although we must continue celebrating those who break through these barriers, we must not forget that their art is still art, and must to valued and integrated into mainstream culture as such.
—
Erin and her Objectives
Me an technology do not get along, much like my mother and technology. She refers all questions to Dad, without trying to figure it out herself. I am a self proclaimed Luddite- I walk into a room and computer with shut off. But in this technological age, where we are immersed whether it be by choice or not, there is no denying our dependence on the stuff! I tend to navigate all the technology that is imposed upon me on a day to day basis: filling out forms online, shopping online, keeping up with friends, uploading pictures, watching videos, blogging and reading blogs too.
But what strikes me is my passive consumption of these online service. I am browsing, absorbing, spending and supporting. With the exception of my blog, which I do not make money from, I rely on these online features, while producing nothing. I contribute nothing except nameless hits on peoples' blog stats, furthering the ever pervasive market research.
My history with technology was that I was born and educated before we became so dependant on the forms so prevalent today. I was raised before microwaves and laptops, I went to school before Internet and cellphones, I learned to type on a computer larger than our TV, I played video games back before Macintosh computers had been re-branded Apple.
Interrogating girls relationships with technology interests me greatly, because I do believe I see a gendered difference in our interactions with technology both in our proficiency utilizing it and in our under representation in fields such as web design and computer programing.
Is this a learned behaviour? Would my awkwardness around technology different if I had have been a boy? Why do I ask for help instead of sort out problems myself? Why isn't a girl geek a feature in films and tv shows?
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
References
Currie, K., & Pomerantz. (2009). Chapter 2: “Hardly innocent” popular meanings of girlhood (27- 52). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Driscoll, C. (2008). Girls Today: Girls, girl culture and girls studies. Journal of Girlhood Studies, Summer 1(1) 13-32.
Driver, S. (2007). Queer Girls and Popular Culture, (1-30). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Girls DJ.com. Retrieved Nov, 26, 2011. http://www.girlsdj.com/participants.html
Lesko, N. (1996). Past, present, and future conceptions of adolescence. Educational Theory, 46(4), 453.
Lipkin, E. (2009) Girls Studies. Berkley, California: Seal Press.
Kearney, M.C. (2009). Coalescing: The development of Girls Studies, Feminist Formations Spring 21 (1) 1-28.
